Articles tagged with actoxo xox ceosoxo xox dodd-frankoxo xox expectationsoxo xox streetoxo xox walloxo xox

oxo Remove a tag from the tag selection xox Keep a tag in the selection and remove others

United States: Regulatory: Why Is "Abusive" The Most Feared Word In Dodd-Frank? - Foley & Lardner

A discussion on the regulatory guidance given for the meaning of the word 'abusive' under UDAAP The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

act discussion dodd-frank foley guidance lardner protection states street udaap united wall

Found 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

United States: Reminder Of Upcoming Dodd-Frank Compliance Dates For End-Users - Vinson & Elkins LLP

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 imposes a new regulatory framework upon swap dealers, major swap participants and other counterparties to swaps, including end-users.

act compliance dodd-frank elkins llp protection states street united vinson wall

Found 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

Too Big To Fail: 3 Lessons of the “London Whale” Debacle

Of the many scandals that have plagued Wall Street of late, the “London Whale” trades, which cost banking giant JPMorgan Chase more than $6 billion, has captured the attention of the financial media more than any other. The biggest reason for journalists’ obsession with this story is that it tarnished the reputation of JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who is widely thought to be one of the most competent bank CEOs in the business, and one of the few who ably steered his bank through the subprime-mortgage crisis. And as far as the media is concerned, the bigger they come, the more people like to watch ’em fall. But there is more to this story than the comeuppance of the biggest banker on the Street today. The London Whale debacle, and the subsequent Senate investigation, gives us a window into the culture and operations of the biggest bank in America as it adjusts to a postcrisis world in which Dodd-Frank is the law of the land. And the picture painted isn’t exactly comforting. The ...

america attention billion business ceo ceos chase cio comeuppance competence dimon dodd-frank insolvency institutions investigation investment jamie journalists jpmorgan london whale luckily obsession office operations reputation senate situation street wall

Found more than 1 month ago on channel TIME Moneyland

Read the full article on TIME Moneyland or check out related articles on tibidy

What Have We Learned? 3 Lessons from the London Whale Trading Debacle

Of the many scandals that have plagued Wall Street of late, the “London Whale” trades, which cost banking giant JPMorgan Chase more than $6 billion, has captured the attention of the financial media more than any other. The biggest reason for journalists’ obsession with this story is that it tarnished the reputation of JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who is widely thought to be one of the most competent bank CEOs in the business, and one of the few who ably steered his bank through the subprime mortgage crisis. And as far as the media is concerned, the bigger they come, the more people like to watch ‘em fall. But there is more to this story than the comeuppance of the biggest banker on the Street today. The London Whale debacle, and the subsequent Senate investigation, gives us a window into the culture and operations of the biggest bank in America as it adjusts to a post-crisis world in which Dodd-Frank is the law of the land. And the picture painted isn’t exactly comforting. The ...

america attention billion business ceo ceos chase cio comeuppance competence dimon dodd-frank insolvency institutions investigation investment jamie journalists jpmorgan london whale luckily obsession office operations reputation senate situation street wall

Found more than 1 month ago on channel TIME Business

Read the full article on TIME Business or check out related articles on tibidy

On Executive Comp, the Swiss Aren’t Neutral — Will the U.S. Be Persuaded?

For more than a century, the Swiss have managed to stay out of conflicts and wars. But when it comes to excessive corporate compensations, they are hardly neutral. Last Sunday, 68% of Swiss voters accepted a groundbreaking proposal that will require shareholders to approve the pay of executives and board members of public companies. The result of the controversial nationwide referendum reverberated around the world because it set radical new rules for corporate governance that could spill over to other countries. Several nations already allow shareholders to have a say on executive compensation, and the EU agreed last week to cap bankers’ bonuses at twice their salaries. In the U.S., the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, passed in 2010, requires all public corporations to seek a non-binding shareholder approval of executive compensations. But Switzerland’s new legislation will be by far the strictest, because the “say on pay” will be compulsory rather than ...

act business comp compensation competitiveness corporation democracy dodd-frank forum garelli glencore governance imd lausanne legislation minder nation nestle novartis protection roche sentence stephane street swiss switzerland thomas viewpoint wall

Found more than 1 month ago on channel TIME Business

Read the full article on TIME Business or check out related articles on tibidy

Page 1 Next page >