Did Google’s Promise to ‘Do No Evil’ Convince the FTC to Do Nothing About Its Search Bias?
Has the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) been seduced by Google’s famous promise to “do no evil?” That’s the question a lot of critics are asking in the wake of the Internet search giant’s antitrust settlement with the FTC last week. The problem, critics say, isn’t simply that Google got off lightly; it’s that the FTC allowed Google to set the terms – both in defining whether the company’s behavior was harmful and in setting the terms of its punishment. “For critics of Google,” NYU Information Law Institute Fellow Nathan Newman writes on the Huffington Post, “[the] FTC decision is not bad news because we disagree with the results, but bad news because it reflects an enforcement agency failing to even ask the right questions.” (MORE: What Google’s FTC Deal Means for the Patent Wars) One of the central questions in the FTC’s antitrust investigation was how exactly to determine whether Google’s dominance in the search engine business has caused harm – and to ...
action
agency
billion
business
commission
convenience
decision
dominance
edward
enforcement
federal
ftc
google
government
huffington
information
institute
internet
investigation
location
mapquest
nathan
newman
nyu
punishment
question
service
services
settlement
times
wyatt
york
Did Google’s Promise to “Do No Evil” Convince the FTC to Do Nothing About its Search Bias?
Has the Federal Trade Commission been seduced by Google’s famous promise to “do no evil?” That’s the question a lot of critics are asking in the wake of the Internet search giant’s antitrust settlement with the FTC last week. The problem, critics say, isn’t simply that Google got off lightly; it’s that the FTC allowed Google to set the terms – both in defining whether the company’s behavior was harmful and in setting the terms of its punishment. “For critics of Google,” NYU Information Law Institute Fellow Nathan Newman writes on the Huffington Post, “[the] FTC decision is not bad news because we disagree with the results, but bad news because it reflects an enforcement agency failing to even ask the right questions.” (MORE: What Google’s FTC Deal Means for the Patent Wars) One of the central questions in the FTC’s antitrust investigation was how exactly to determine whether Google’s dominance in the search engine business has caused harm – and to whom? ...
action
agency
billion
business
commission
convenience
decision
dominance
edward
enforcement
federal
ftc
google
government
huffington
information
institute
internet
investigation
location
mapquest
nathan
newman
nyu
punishment
question
service
services
settlement
times
wyatt
york
10 Banks Agree to Pay $8.5B for Foreclosure Abuse
(WASHINGTON) — Ten major banks and mortgage companies agreed Monday to pay $8.5 billion to settle federal complaints that they wrongfully foreclosed on homeowners who should have been allowed to stay in their homes. The banks, which include JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, will pay billions to homeowners to end a review process of foreclosure files that was required under a 2011 enforcement action. The review was ordered because banks mishandled people’s paperwork and skipped required steps in the foreclosure process. Under the new settlement, people who were wrongfully foreclosed on could receive from $1,000 up to $125,000. Failing to offer someone a loan modification would be considered a lighter offense; unfairly seizing and selling a person’s home would entitle that person to the biggest payment, according to guidelines released last summer by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Monday’s settlement was announced jointly by the OCC and the Federal reserve. ...
action
agreement
america
assistance
aurora
billion
chase
citigroup
comptroller
corp
currency
curry
direction
emc
enforcement
fargo
federal
finance
gmac
hsbc
independence
jpmorgan
metlife
million
modifications
occ
office
payments
pnc
service
services
settlement
statement
suntrust
thomas
washington
wells
Stealth spending on the rise as Election Day approaches
Thursday, October 18, 2012 - 13:45 Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Romney campaign pins are on display for sale in the GOP gift shop during the third day of the Republican National Convention. The top two spending organizations taking advantage of the Citizens United decision are Republican backers. After the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling that unleashed corporate and union spending on elections, there seemed to be a silver lining: the identity of those who fund all those annoying ads would be revealed to the public on a regular basis. It hasn’t quite worked out that way. Since Labor Day, spending by outside groups taking advantage of the high court’s Citizens United decision totaled a little more than $229 million, including unions. Forty-four percent of the total — $100 million — has come from non-disclosing, nonprofit corporations. The clearest example comes from the top two spenders. Both organizations are Republican backers. And they also happen to share the same ...
action
advocacy
american
americans
anti-obama
anti-romney
barack obama
california
center
chamber
collaboration
commerce
commission
congressional
contran
contributions
convention
corp
corporation
court
crossroads
decision
democrat
democratic
district
donations
duckworth
dunbar
eighty-eight
election
fec
federal
forty-four
frontline
getty images
gop
government
gps
harold
house
identity
ies
illinois
imagination
integrity
iraq
john
karl
labor
limited
majority
marcus
missouri
national
office
ohio
organization
pac
pacs
post-citizens
president
priority
pro-obama
pro-romney
rachael
republican
romney
rove
sarah
senate
service
simmons
somodevilla
stealth
steelman
story
strategists
super
supreme
tammy
texas
twenty-seven
type
united
usa
virginia
washington
wisconsin
The summer of super PAC money
Friday, September 21, 2012 - 12:39 AP Photo/Gerald Herbert President Barack Obama waves as he arrives to speak at a fundraiser at The House of Blues in New Orleans, Wednesday, July 25, 2012. Democratic super PACs have begun to make up ground in the political arms race, raising substantially more in August than they did during the previous month, new filings with the Federal Election Commission show. For much of the 2012 election cycle, Democratic super PACs have been outraised by their GOP rivals. The groups, made possible after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling , are allowed to collect contributions of unlimited size from individuals, unions and companies — so long as the funds are spent on advertisements that are not coordinated with any candidate. Priorities USA Action , the primary super PAC supporting the re-election of President Barack Obama, took in $10.1 million through the end of August. That’s up from $4.8 million in July. While the group finished ...
action
advertisement
allen
america
american
americans
ameritrade
angelos
anne
anti-republican
arizona
balance
baldwin
baltimore
barack obama
berg
bilbray
blues
bob
bono
brian
brotherhood
california
canadian
carpenters
chamber
chambers
childs
clayton
commerce
commission
committee
congressional
contributions
conway
court
cox
crossroads
d-n
d-w
d-wis
daddy
dakota
davis
dccc
dean
deb
democratic
democrats
denny
dick
district
donations
donnelly
election
energy
enterprises
exception
fair
fairfax
federal
fischer
florida
foundation
freedom
freedomworks
gaby
general
george
gerald
gillespie
gop
gov
gps
hawaii
hayden
heidi
heinrich
heitkamp
heller
herbert
heritage
holdings
house
hughes
illinois
indiana
insurance
international
ivy
james
jay
jerry
joe
john
kaine
karl
kerrey
kyrsten
laborers
linda
lingle
lugar
mack
majority
marcus
marilyn
martin
mary
montana
mostyn
mourdock
nebraska
nevada
north
odyssey
orioles
orleans
pac
pacs
parsons
patriot
perry
peter
president
priority
pro-mitt
pro-obama
r-calif
r-fla
r-n
rachael
rehberg
reinsurance
renaissance
rep
republican
richard
rick
ricketts
robert
rockefeller
rodney
romney
rove
scouts
sen
senate
senate-focused
senatorial
service
simons
sinema
steve
strategists
super
supreme
tammy
technology
texas
tim
treasurer
union
united
usa
virginia
wayne
weaver
west
williams