Articles tagged with llpoxo xox proskaueroxo xox supremeoxo xox unitedoxo xox

oxo Remove a tag from the tag selection xox Keep a tag in the selection and remove others

United States: Supreme Court: Certification Requires Class-Wide Proof Of Damages - Proskauer Rose LLP

The dissent in today’s Supreme Court decision on class certification, Comcast Corp. v. Behrends ( PDF copy here), argues that "the decision should not be read to require, as a prerequisite to certification, that damages attributable to a classwide injury be measurable on a class-wide basis."

behrends certification comcast corp court decision llp proskauer states supreme united

Found 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

United States: How Much "Competition", If Any, Is Required To Establish Standing In Lanham Act False Advertising Cases—The Supreme Court May Be Interested In Resolving The Three-Way Circuit Split - Proskauer Rose LLP

A discussion on one area of Lanham Act jurisprudence, where the federal appellate courts do not see eye-to-eye concerns who has standing to sue under the Lanham Act's false advertising prong.

act circuit competition court discussion jurisprudence lanham llp proskauer states supreme united

Found 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

United States: California Supreme Court Expands Fraud Exception To The Parol Evidence Rule, Eliminating Significant Barrier To Claims Of Promissory Fraud Against Insurers - Proskauer Rose LLP

Last month, the California Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent and restored to full force the fraud exception to California's parol evidence rule.

california court evidence exception llp parol proskauer states supreme united

Found more than 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

United States: California Supreme Court Rules On Mixed Motive Defense To Discrimination Claims, But Large Verdicts Persist… - Proskauer Rose LLP

Wynona Harris, a bus driver for the City of Santa Monica (the City), alleged that she was fired because of her pregnancy.

california city court defense discrimination harris llp monica persist pregnancy proskauer santa states supreme united verdicts wynona

Found more than 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

United States: Supreme Court Asked To Decide If Retaliation Claims Require New Administrative Charge - Proskauer Rose LLP

On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court was petitioned to rule on whether employees must file a new or amended charge to pursue an employment retaliation claim arising from an initial Title VII discrimination charge.

court discrimination employment llp proskauer retaliation states supreme title united vii

Found more than 1 month ago on channel Mondaq

Read the full article on Mondaq or check out related articles on tibidy

Page 1 Next page >

tibidy-business.com

Cross-read the freshest news on business and global market places.

United States: Supreme Court: Certification Requires Class-Wide Proof Of Damages - Proskauer Rose LLP

The dissent in today’s Supreme Court decision on class certification, Comcast Corp. v. Behrends ( PDF copy here), argues that "the decision should not be read to require, as a prerequisite to certification, that damages attributable to a classwide injury be measurable on a class-wide basis."

United States: How Much "Competition", If Any, Is Required To Establish Standing In Lanham Act False Advertising Cases—The Supreme Court May Be Interested In Resolving The Three-Way Circuit Split - Proskauer Rose LLP

A discussion on one area of Lanham Act jurisprudence, where the federal appellate courts do not see eye-to-eye concerns who has standing to sue under the Lanham Act's false advertising prong.

United States: California Supreme Court Expands Fraud Exception To The Parol Evidence Rule, Eliminating Significant Barrier To Claims Of Promissory Fraud Against Insurers - Proskauer Rose LLP

Last month, the California Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent and restored to full force the fraud exception to California's parol evidence rule.

United States: California Supreme Court Rules On Mixed Motive Defense To Discrimination Claims, But Large Verdicts Persist… - Proskauer Rose LLP

Wynona Harris, a bus driver for the City of Santa Monica (the City), alleged that she was fired because of her pregnancy.

United States: Supreme Court Asked To Decide If Retaliation Claims Require New Administrative Charge - Proskauer Rose LLP

On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court was petitioned to rule on whether employees must file a new or amended charge to pursue an employment retaliation claim arising from an initial Title VII discrimination charge.

tibidy-business.com

Cross-read the freshest news on business and global market places.

United States: Supreme Court: Certification Requires Class-Wide Proof Of Damages - Proskauer Rose LLP

The dissent in today’s Supreme Court decision on class certification, Comcast Corp. v. Behrends ( PDF copy here), argues that "the decision should not be read to require, as a prerequisite to certification, that damages attributable to a classwide injury be measurable on a class-wide basis."

United States: How Much "Competition", If Any, Is Required To Establish Standing In Lanham Act False Advertising Cases—The Supreme Court May Be Interested In Resolving The Three-Way Circuit Split - Proskauer Rose LLP

A discussion on one area of Lanham Act jurisprudence, where the federal appellate courts do not see eye-to-eye concerns who has standing to sue under the Lanham Act's false advertising prong.

United States: California Supreme Court Expands Fraud Exception To The Parol Evidence Rule, Eliminating Significant Barrier To Claims Of Promissory Fraud Against Insurers - Proskauer Rose LLP

Last month, the California Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent and restored to full force the fraud exception to California's parol evidence rule.

United States: California Supreme Court Rules On Mixed Motive Defense To Discrimination Claims, But Large Verdicts Persist… - Proskauer Rose LLP

Wynona Harris, a bus driver for the City of Santa Monica (the City), alleged that she was fired because of her pregnancy.

United States: Supreme Court Asked To Decide If Retaliation Claims Require New Administrative Charge - Proskauer Rose LLP

On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court was petitioned to rule on whether employees must file a new or amended charge to pursue an employment retaliation claim arising from an initial Title VII discrimination charge.

Content related tags

Tibidy's tags of the moment

Tibidy's common tags