Canada: Reasonable – But Diminished – Expectation Of Privacy In Contents Of Employer-Owned Laptop - Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Justice Fish, writing for the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, has held that while an employer's ownership of a laptop, its workplace policies and practices, and technology in place can diminish an employee's reasonable expectation of privacy, they do not eliminate it: R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53.
borden
canada
cole
court
employer-owned
expectations
fish
gervais
justice
ladner
llp
majority
ownership
policy
practices
privacy
scc
supreme
technology
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Mondaq
Canada: Can The Trustee Of An Incapable Adult Obtain Privileged Information Previously Received By The Latter? - Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Doreen Wayne suffers from dementia. Her son William was appointed as committee (trustee) of her estate by the BC Supreme Court, and wanted to obtain the file related to her affairs from her lawyers.
borden
canada
court
doreen
gervais
information
ladner
llp
supreme
wayne
william
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Mondaq
Canada: Different But Hopefully Equal? Federal And Provincial Employment Standards To Be Considered By The Supreme Court - McCarthy Tétrault LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave in an appeal about whether provincial or federal legislation governs workplace compensation for federal workers.
canada
compensation
court
employment
federal
legislation
llp
mccarthy tétrault
supreme
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Mondaq
United States: Class Action Issues In Supreme Court: Assessing The Significance Of "Amgen" - Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
During the current term, the Supreme Court heard or will hear a number of cases bearing on a plaintiff's ability to successfully bring and maintain federal class action lawsuits.
ability
action
amgen
cadwalader
court
llp
significance
states
supreme
taft
united
wickersham
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Mondaq
United States: U.S. Supreme Court Argument On "Reverse Payments" Suggests Potential For Compromise Holding Not Advocated By FTC Or Pharmaceuticals Industry - Loeb & Loeb LLP
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to address whether reverse payment agreements common in Hatch-Waxman litigations are presumptively anticompetitive and unlawful.
agreement
arguments
commission
court
federal
ftc
hatch-waxman
litigation
llp
loeb
payments
pharmaceuticals
states
supreme
united
watson
Found more than 1 month ago on channel
Mondaq